Area Forecast Discussion
Issued by NWS Central Illinois

Current Version |  Previous Version |  Text Only |  Print | Product List |  Glossary On
Versions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
-- Highlight Changed Discussion --
-- Discussion containing changed information from previous version are highlighted. --
720 FXUS63 KILX 171503 AFDILX Area Forecast Discussion...Updated National Weather Service Lincoln IL 1003 AM CDT Fri May 17 2024 .KEY MESSAGES... - Patchy fog will cause transient visibility reductions through 8 to 9am this morning, with the greatest potential for visibility less than half a mile (50-70%) west of the IL River. Visibilities this low can increase the risk of pedestrian and automobile accidents, so drivers should use extra caution early this morning. - Each day Sunday through Tuesday, increasing warmth and humidity will lead to heat indices in the upper 80s to low 90s. This will pose at least a small risk for heat-related illness in vulnerable populations. - Thunderstorm chances increase early next week, peaking at 80% late Tuesday. Storms Monday night through Tuesday night could be severe with damaging winds and hail, but uncertainty is high in timing and precise location of severe weather. && .UPDATE...
-- Changed Discussion --
Issued at 1002 AM CDT Fri May 17 2024 Vis sat shows the last hints of fog near the IL River in southern Peoria County quickly eroding, however, new areas of low diurnal Cu have developed near the I-72 corridor. High-res models have not been handling this well, so some low confidence, manual adjustments to increase cloud cover were made in the grids. The latest high-res guidance continues to show dense fog development across eastern and southeastern IL tonight, which seems reasonable given what has occurred in prior nights. For Saturday, soundings look quite dry both in and above the boundary layer, with some weak capping present as well, and I don`t think there`s enough to warrant holding onto a precip mention, so removed the 15-30% PoPs from SE IL. Will still need to keep an eye on the precip potential from a front that approaches from the west Sat evening, but at present it seems like any associated precip dissipates with the loss of diurnal heating, before reaching the ILX CWA. Erwin
-- End Changed Discussion --
&& .DISCUSSION... Issued at 205 AM CDT Fri May 17 2024 Current nighttime microphysics satellite imagery shows cirrostratus lifting northeast across areas mainly east of the IL River as an elongated upper disturbance meanders through the Ozarks and into the Tennessee River Valley. A piece of enhanced vorticity associated with this wave is forecast to lift northward towards southern IL this afternoon, sparking a few garden-variety storms. These storms will be both unorganized and slow-moving given the low shear environment, and given tall and skinny CAPE profiles (favoring warm cloud processes) with 1000-2000 J/kg SBCAPE they could certainly produce some briefly heavy rain, but they`ll be transient enough that I`d be shocked if there were any hydrological issues. In the more near-term, though, the main forecast concern is fog; it`s likely to be most persistent and dense west of the IL River where those mid-high clouds are less dense, but given yesterday`s rain the low levels are quite moist so more transient visibility reductions are in play elsewhere. HREF guidance has probabilities for visibilities less than a half mile peaking from 15-30% along I-70 to 50-70+% west of the IL River around 6-8am, and then quickly dropping off thereafter as surface heating erodes the stuff. Tomorrow, a piece of upper energy will drift southeast through our area, but given a ridge will be building in quickly behind it synoptic forcing for ascent should considerably limit shower coverage. The CAMs are not completely dry, but they`re developing very little with coverage being generally less than 10-15%. Sunday is a bit more questionable, given the ridge axis shifts east and an upper trough passes too close for comfort to our northwest. The GFS does clip areas west of the IL River with some light QPF as convection that develops over the Central Plains comes here to die with waning instability/shear on the eastern fringe of a warm front, and the NAM (though the most aggressive at this juncture) advertises 2000+ J/kg of SBCAPE with an inverted-V type sounding in Galesburg Sunday afternoon/evening. However, other guidance is dry; needless to say, convective potential is conditional Sunday (and would most likely be sub-severe again), but it`s not something we`re going to take our eyes off of just yet. The better opportunity for storms will come with the stronger trough ejecting out of the Desert Southwest and across the Plains on Monday, and approaching central Illinois late Tuesday. Given the origin of this system and its strength, an EML should make its way into the region to foster steep mid level lapse rates and consequently at least elevated instability. So after perhaps a couple more garden variety storms early on Monday, the warm front`s arrival -- sometime between Monday evening and lunchtime Tuesday, depending on which model you look at -- will mark an intrusion of a more volatile environment conducive to stronger storms posing a diurnal risk for all hazards and nocturnal risk for large hail. Current thinking is that Monday night into early Tuesday we could have a few large-hail producing storms, with more widespread strong- severe storms capable of all hazards on Tuesday with increasing shear as the surface low and its attendant cold front (forcing mechanism) approach. However, it`s still too early to say how things will materialize; we`ve certainly dodged several bullets this year as storms further south gobbled up our moisture/instability, which is always a possibility with this event. We`ll continue to monitor. Depending on convection and associated cloud cover, temps could become quite warm (upper 80s degF, perhaps touching 90 in a few spots) Sunday through Tuesday, and with increasing low level moisture (dewpoints likely to hit 70 degF most areas at some point) heat indices could certainly climb into the 90s. The LREF suggests probabilities for this are generally 15% or less (highest on Tuesday), but I`m not convinced the chance is truly this low given our forecast dewpoints are running a 2-4 degrees lower than the deterministic models would say. Oftentimes, especially on days like Sunday and Monday when we don`t have strong low level moisture advection, mixing will decrease afternoon dewpoints by a couple degrees, but since this can also lead to overperforming temps I would not be surprised to see heat indices overachieve on any of these days. It`s been since autumn that we`ve been quite this warm, so the lack of acclimation to these temps and humidity will pose at least some risk for heat-related illness to vulnerable populations such as outdoor workers, the elderly, very young, chronically ill, and unhoused. Behind the system on Wednesday, the area is forecast to cool to near- normal and a more stable airmass should, at least briefly, build into the region offering a reprieve from convection. Late next week, forecast confidence decreases as model differences become increasingly vast in the timing and strength of shortwaves rippling across the Midwest in a quasi-zonal flow regime. Bumgardner && .AVIATION... (For the 12z TAFs through 12z Saturday Morning) Issued at 549 AM CDT Fri May 17 2024 Areas of dense fog along and north of a roughly Champaign to Macomb line will continue a couple more hours this morning, resulting in IFR to LIFR visibilities at PIA, BMI, and CMI. DEC and SPI will likely straddle the MVFR category, but may fluctuate considerably. After roughly 13z (8am), improvement should be rapid with surface heating eroding the fog and low stratus. VFR conditions should be predominant through the first part of tonight, though another round of patchy fog could cause jumpy visibilities at the terminals after roughly 07z (2am) Saturday. Bumgardner && .ILX WATCHES/WARNINGS/ADVISORIES...
-- Changed Discussion --
None.
-- End Changed Discussion --
&& $$