Quantitative Precipitation Forecast
Issued by NWS

Home |  Current Version |  Previous Version |  Text Only |  Print | Product List |  Glossary On
Versions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
323
FOUS30 KWBC 041551
QPFERD

Excessive Rainfall Discussion
NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD
1151 AM EDT Tue Jun 4 2024

Day 1
Valid 16Z Tue Jun 04 2024 - 12Z Wed Jun 05 2024

...THERE IS A MODERATE RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ACROSS PORTIONS
OF OKLAHOMA, NORTHEAST TEXAS, SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS AND NORTHWEST
LOUISIANA...

...16Z Update...

The general premise from the previous forecast remains the same
with the focal point aligned over the southern plains into the
ArklaTex and Lower Mississippi Valley. Secondary maxima will occur
across the Midwest due to a culmination of low pressure propagation
into the central Midwest over IA/IL/WI, as well as large scale
ascent focused in-of the northern Midwest from an approaching
shortwave trough analyzed over the northern plains into
Saskatchewan. The inherited MDT risk was expanded a bit on the
northern and eastern periphery to account for trends in guidance
depicting a QPF maximum positioned on the northern edge of a tight
theta-E gradient bisecting central and northern OK down through
eastern OK into AR. 12z HREF neighborhood probabilities for at
least 3" was between 40-70% across much of the MDT risk area with
the maximum situated very close to the previously impacted area
from this mornings MCS leading to above average potential for flash
flood concerns within the area given the negligible recovery time
frame. Almost all of the area in the MDT is facing well above
average soil moisture (90-99th percentile), and is currently
facing regionally high stream flows as indicated via the latest
river forecasts and observations from the various River Forecast
Centers across the outlined area. There is still some uncertainty
on more specific details on the anticipated evolution and track of
the forecast MCS, but the bounds of the MDT risk encompass the
higher probability for impact over the course of the evening.

Further north, a cluster of thunderstorms will impact multiple
areas of the northern and central Midwest with a broad area of
probabilities for >2" pushing 25-50% within spots in IA/IL/WI/MN.
Convection across MN will be more linear in nature as a strong
shortwave pivots over the area with an ascent pattern favoring a
long line of thunderstorms capable of heavy rain that would induce
local flood concerns. FFG`s are lowest in south-central MN thanks
to previous rainfall, so the best chance for flooding will likely
lie along and north of US212 with the Minneapolis-St Paul metro up
into the north-central part of the state as the area of interest.
Further south, convective pattern will remain more scattered in
nature, but favorable surface based forcing will aid in locally
heavy rains extending from eastern IA through western and northern
IL. A few storms may produce rainfall exceeding 3" within a short
time frame and some smaller organized thunderstorm clusters could
enhance rainfall further, mainly within the confines of the
propagating low pressure motioning northeast through the period.

Kleebauer


...Previous Discussion...

We upgraded to a Moderate risk across portions of southeast OK,
northeast TX, southwest AR and northwest LA with this update. This
is with the expectation that these areas will most likely see two
organized convective complexes today...one this morning and another
tonight. Expect an MCS with some brief training will be ongoing at
12z across portions of southeast OK and northeast TX. Given the
favorable downstream environment, this convective complex is
likely to persist as it dives southeast across portions of eastern
TX, LA and southwest AR. The complex should become more progressive
with time, however short duration heavy rates are still likely to
drive some flash flood threat.

By later this afternoon into this evening additional forcing
moving into The Plains is likely to trigger convection over
portions of KS and OK. Given the degree of large scale forcing, the
extreme instability forecast, and the strong low level moisture
transport...upscale convective growth appears likely. This complex
should track over similar areas of OK, TX, AR and LA tonight. Even
without these two complexes much of this region has been quite wet
of late...with elevated streamflows and well above average soil
saturation. Combine those antecedent conditions with the potential
for two more rounds of organized convection today...and scattered
to numerous instances of flash flooding appear likely. This
warrants the upgrade to a MDT risk, with some significant flash
flooding possible.

This MDT risk is surrounded by a large Slight risk that stretches
from KS/MO all the way to MN and WI. Pretty strong large scale
forcing expected from IA into MN with a sharp mid level trough and
plenty of shortwave and upper jet energy to work with. Most
indications are that the front and convection will be progressive
in nature, which should end up limiting the upper bound potential
of rainfall totals. However also tracking a well defined shortwave
that is near the KS/MO border as of 08z. This feature will track
northeast today, and may act as a convective focus over portions of
IA, IL and WI by later today into tonight. Thus some of these
areas could see two rounds of convection today/tonight, locally
increasing the flash flood threat. Still generally not the
strongest HREF signal...strictly looking at HREF QPF probabilities
would suggest this is a borderline Marginal to Slight risk.
However will also note that the IA to MN and WI portion of this
risk does already have above average streamflows and soil moisture
from past rainfall. Thus flash flood susceptibility will likely
also be higher than normal...which combined with PWs around the
climatological 90th percentile...suggests some flash flood risk
exists and the Slight risk remains warranted.

A Marginal risk remains in place over much of the Southeast into
the TN valley and southern Mid-Atlantic. One MCV over northern MS
as of 08z, will track eastward and likely help trigger/organize
some convection over portions of TN, AL and GA today. Another
shortwave/MCV moving in from the west may help focus convection
over portions of the Southeast and/or TN valley tonight. Otherwise
plentiful instability and increasing moisture will support
isolated to scattered convection over a large geographic extent.
Still not seeing enough agreement on where any more organized
flood threat could evolve to upgrade any of this area to a Slight
risk. At this time think the broad Marginal risk is most
appropriate, with an isolated flash flood threat.

Chenard


Day 2
Valid 12Z Wed Jun 05 2024 - 12Z Thu Jun 06 2024

...THERE IS A MARGINAL RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ACROSS PORTIONS
OF THE CENTRAL AND EASTERN U.S....

The frontal system moves east on Wednesday bringing a convective
threat to a large portion of the southern and eastern U.S.. A broad
Marginal risk stretches from TX across the TN/OH valley and into
portions of the Great lakes and Northeast...pretty much everywhere
along and just ahead of this front. Moisture is plentiful with this
system, with PWs over the climatological 90th percentile
(especially over the Mid-Atlantic). Instability is not extreme,
but should be sufficient for deep convective development. The main
limiting factor should be the progressive nature of the system
limiting the duration of heaviest rainfall. However we are likely
to see multiple low amplitude shortwaves moving east ahead of the
cold front, which should also act as a focus for convective
development. This suggests that some areas could see multiple
rounds of convection. Of course this also means a more messy
convective evolution, which may end up impacting destabilization.
All to say that while an isolated flash flood risk exists over a
large geographic extent, confidence on pinning down an area where
the flash flood risk is more organized remains low. So while an
embedded Slight risk may be needed somewhere from the TN Valley
into the Mid-Atlantic, still think the broad Marginal will suffice
for now.

Will need to keep an eye on southeast TX into the lower MS Valley.
It seems probable that an MCS will be moving across this area
Wednesday morning, and several of the higher res models suggest
this complex leaves behind a well defined MCV. This MCV could
become the focus for additional organized convective development
later Wednesday, which would result in a more focused flash flood
risk. While we may eventually need a Slight risk upgrade to
account for this threat, think it`s a bit too early for that at
this point...as this is conditional on how convection evolves
Tuesday and Tuesday night. So will keep things at a Marginal and
continue to monitor.

Also extended the Marginal risk into portions of the Northeast
with this update. While the stronger forcing holds off until
Thursday, it looks like there`s some weak shortwave energy over
NH/ME and about 1000-2000 j/kg of CAPE helping trigger isolated to
scattered convection Wednesday. Several HREF members have some slow
moving convection developing, with 2" neighborhood probabilities
over 40%. This setup may lead to a very localized flash flood
threat.


Chenard


Day 3
Valid 12Z Thu Jun 06 2024 - 12Z Fri Jun 07 2024

...THERE IS A MARGINAL RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ACROSS PORTIONS
OF THE NORTHEAST....

...Northeast...
An interesting setup for heavy rainfall over the Northeast on
Thursday. Stronger mid/upper level forcing moves in from the west,
and at the surface we`ll likely have prolonged convergence
along/near a north south oriented occluded front over NY/VT, and a
west east stationary front over southern New England. The
persistence of these features suggest some duration to the rainfall
is possible with this event. It seems like the main uncertainty
comes down to the degree of instability collocated with this better
convergence/forcing. The CSU ML tool does suggest Slight risk
probabilities over portions of the Northeast with this event. This
does not seem too unreasonable given the forcing and PWs in place.
However given the uncertainty on instability and the fact that
these areas have generally been dry of late with below average
streamflows and soil saturation...think the best course of action
is to stick with a Marginal risk for now.

Chenard


Day 1 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/94epoints.txt
Day 2 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/98epoints.txt
Day 3 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/99epoints.txt