


Quantitative Precipitation Forecast
Issued by NWS
Issued by NWS
724 FOUS30 KWBC 290059 QPFERD Excessive Rainfall Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 859 PM EDT Thu Aug 28 2025 Day 1 Valid 01Z Fri Aug 29 2025 - 12Z Fri Aug 29 2025 ...THERE IS A MARGINAL RISKS OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL OVER MUCH OF THE ROCKIES AS WELL AS FOR PORTIONS OF THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY... ...01Z Update... ...Colorado... The Slight Risk area was downgraded to a Marginal with this update. Shower and thunderstorm activity across the region has underperformed prior forecasts, and the coverage and intensity of storms have not nor are likely to be great enough to cause Slight Risk levels of impacts. The Marginal Risk for the area remains in effect for potential isolated instances of flash flooding. Elsewhere in the West, the Marginal Risk was trimmed out of Arizona and much of New Mexico with this update due to lack of convection. Waning amounts of daylight from here should keep any storms capable of producing flash flooding to isolated coverage. Further north, the Marginal was left roughly the same, following ongoing radar trends suggesting an isolated flash flooding threat remains into Wyoming, portions of Idaho, and Montana. ...Lower Mississippi Valley... The ongoing MCS across the area has become mostly a line of storms, albeit slower moving ones across Texas, but otherwise is both progressive and is not aligning so as to make training convection a large concern. With the nocturnal strengthening of the low level jet, it`s likely there will be some redevelopment of storms across the Marginal Risk area, centered over northern Louisiana. However, the latest guidance is in poor agreement as to the coverage of those storms, or whether they will align in such a way as to promote flash flooding via training. Soils are quite dry from eastern Texas across northern Louisiana and into much of Mississippi, which has raised flash flood guidance values considerably, to near the highest level that flash flood guidance goes. Thus, expect there would need to be numerous training thunderstorms to result in Slight Risk level impacts. The Marginal risk remaining largely covers an isolated instance of flash flooding or two, which are most likely in any urban areas, such as Shreveport or Alexandria. Further west, the Marginal Risk for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex is largely covering ongoing convection in the area, with the threat there likely ending in the next couple hours or so. Wegman Day 2 Valid 12Z Fri Aug 29 2025 - 12Z Sat Aug 30 2025 ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL OVER EASTERN NEW MEXICO INTO THE TEXAS PANHANDLE, AND OVER PORTIONS OF THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY AND SOUTHEAST... ...Lower MS Valley into the Southeast... 20Z Update: Models seem to be taking a more favorable step into the realm of consistency with the axis of heaviest precip now centered over the Lower Mississippi Valley through the Mississippi Pine Belt and Southern Alabama. This is the general orientation of heavy precip when assessing both CAMs and global model output with the former indicating a better signal for precip >3" in any given location, something missing from the global input. Considering the environmental factors and deep layer ascent, there will surely be areas that see >3" of rainfall during the forecast setup with modest neighborhood probabilities for >5" (20-35%) situated across the aforementioned areas. Higher FFG`s will curb the top end of any threat as the recent dry pattern has relegated all 1/3/6 indices to run very high, a state that usually leaves significant flash flood potential muted historically. This pattern is trending to be no different with the greatest threat likely to occur in more urbanized zones and where there`s overlap in heavier precip occurring D1 and D2 leading to a more cumulative evolution which allows more favorability for flooding to occur. The SLGT risk was adjusted a touch further south to account for trends in a northern bias of short term QPF distribution, and to align better with the higher neighborhood probs for >5". Kleebauer ..Previous Discussion.. Given the above model diag, it seems prudent to go ahead with a Slight risk across portions of the region. The environmental ingredients will be conducive to heavy rainfall, with PWs over 2" and a corridor of persistent lower level moisture transport/convergence supporting some backbuilding and/or training potential. Other than the weaker GFS, models show an area of low pressure only slowly moving eastward along a low level frontal axis...with upwards of 2000 j/kg of CAPE near and south of this boundary. Thus it does seem like an excessive rainfall threat could evolve Friday into Friday night with either a persistent swath of convection or multiple convective rounds. The Slight risk area was drawn from portions of central/northern LA into central/southern MS and southwest AL...as this corridor is generally the consensus axis of heaviest rainfall potential from the non-GFS solutions. The high FFG keep this as just a lower end Slight risk for now, and I would expect to see some adjusting of the risk area as we get closer and models better converge on a solution. ...Rockies into the High Plains... 20Z Update: A general expansion of the southern and eastern edge of the SLGT risk across the Southern High Plains was made to account for the expected forward propagation of an MCS that will materialize from the northern TX Panhandle before dropping south along the defined theta_E ridge in place across the TX High Plains. Neighborhood probs for >2" are now upwards of 50-80% for the period with the maxima centered just west of I-27 between Amarillo and Lubbock. Antecedent dry conditions will help alleviate some of the potential initially, but rates between 1-2"/hr for multiple hrs. during time period of impact should be enough to induce isolated to scattered flash flood potential in more urban settings, and in more flash flood prone sections of West TX where low-water crossings exist. Heavy rain threat also exists over the Northern Plains with the maxima likely centered into west-central SD. Rates will be the deterrent for a SLGT risk initially as the threat is more long fused in the nature of convective impact meaning a generally slower accumulation threat and less of a flash signal by definition. As a result, felt it was okay to maintain continuity of the MRGL risk with still a chance at a SLGT risk if the rates forecast tick up within hi-res guidance. Kleebauer ..Previous Discussion.. A Slight risk was also added for eastern NM into the TX Panhandle. We should see an uptick in both CAPE and PW compared to Thursday, and a shortwave feature and upper jet on the northern periphery of the upper level ridging will help initiate convection Friday afternoon. It also looks like some mid/upper level moisture streaming well north and east of Juliette in the Eastern Pacific will move into these areas Friday, likely helping increase rainfall efficiency. High res models indicate convection initiating over eastern NM near higher terrain Friday afternoon, before propagating off to the east. Cell motions look rather quick off to the east, which may end up limiting the extent/magnitude of the flash flood risk. However it looks like enough of a surge in instability and PWs to suggest high rainfall rates, and we could be looking at enough convective coverage to support some upscale convective cluster development. So there seems to be enough there to justify going with a Slight risk over these areas. Elsewhere, areas of convection across portions of NE into SD and MT will pose a localized flash flood risk. Convective coverage and intensity here also looks higher than Thursday, and can not rule out eventually needing another targeted slight risk area, but for now even with the greater convective coverage, any FFG exceedance looks isolated in nature. Chenard Day 3 Valid 12Z Sat Aug 30 2025 - 12Z Sun Aug 31 2025 ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL FROM EASTERN NEW MEXICO INTO WEST TEXAS... 20Z Update: SLGT risk across the Southern High Plains was maintained with minor adjustments on the southern flank of the risk based on QPF trends from the latest national blend and bias corrected QPF. Sufficient boundary layer buoyancy coupled with elevated PWATs and proxy to a robust theta_E ridge in place across West TX will be more than enough to attain a widespread convective signal with eventual upscale growth over the TX Caprock. Current setup would lead to a cumulative precip threat for an areal average of 2-4" with locally higher in the D2-3 periods, a signal more coincident with an escalation of flash flood prospects for areas that see a multiple round impact from organized convective patterns. Given the favorable environment forecast and the increasingly aggressive signal for heavy rain overlap across the TX Panhandle, the SLGT risk will be deemed more on the upper end of the threshold and will be assessed in the coming days for a potential targeted upgrade. Guidance across the Southeast U.S. remains a bit uncertain in terms of where the heaviest precip potential will occur for Saturday with the threat seemingly pushing closer to the Gulf coast through southern GA as we step through the model trends over the past 48 hrs. ML output is favoring the Central Gulf coast and southern GA with a relative min in QPF across LA. If this were to occur, the prospects for flash flooding would become very localized with the best threat in urban areas given such high FFG indices in place across the MS/AL Gulf coast into the FL Panhandle. There`s not enough of a prominent signature to deviate from what is currently forecast, so the main adjustment was to trim the northern extent of the MRGL where a distinct northern bias is present in global deterministic with a better signature closer to the instability maxima situated along the immediate Gulf coast. A future upgrade in proximity to the coastal plain is plausible if the signal becomes more robust in its presentation, especially in range of the CAMs. Kleebauer ..Previous Discussions.. ...Rockies into the Plains... Mid/upper level riding will gradually breakdown by Saturday over the Plains resulting in increased troughing and embedded shortwave energy. This should drive rather widespread convection from TX/NM all the way into the Dakotas. A Slight risk was maintained from eastern NM into the TX Panhandle and west central TX where the ingredients appear better for an excessive rainfall threat. This area will see an uptick in instability compared to Friday, with PWs also trending slightly higher and well within the range of supporting heavy rainfall rates. The right entrance region of an upper jet and an increase in low level moisture transport Saturday evening support an organized convective threat. Convective details this far out are uncertain, but the overall pattern supports terrain driven convection over NM growing upscale as it moves eastward into western TX resulting in an isolated to scattered flash flood threat. ...Southeast... More uncertainty exists over the Southeast by Saturday. As was described in the day 2 discussion, still think the 00z GFS is an outlier and lower probability solution. Most other models indicate a lingering frontal boundary with a surface low and enhanced moisture transport. Thus it seems more likely than not that at least localized areas of heavy rainfall will remain possible from the Gulf Coast and possibly into portions of GA and SC. The northern extent of this risk is more uncertain, and quite possible the 00z ECMWF (and other recent ECMWF runs) is too far north and east. But somewhere from the central Gulf Coast into north FL and southern GA still looks in play for heavy rainfall Saturday into Saturday night. The overall environmental ingredients would support Slight risk level rainfall...however the combination of high FFG and above average uncertainty suggests sticking with a broad Marginal risk is the best course of action for now. Chenard Day 1 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/94epoints.txt Day 2 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/98epoints.txt Day 3 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/99epoints.txt